Different thoughts about thinking differently

Posts Tagged ‘writing’

Three posts on reading plus a bonus tip

Sunday, June 13th, 2010
Cover of "How to Read a Book (A Touchston...

Cover of How to Read a Book (A Touchstone book)

You would think that people would know how to read, especially if they’re reading blogs, like you are.  But a lot of people could probably benefit from some ideas on how to read more effectively.

During the past week I’ve stumbled across three different articles that talk about the art of reading that I’d like to recommend to you.

How To Read (Brian Clark of Copyblogger)

Brian refers to How To Read A Book, which describes four different kinds of reading:  from the simplest skims to in-depth analysis, questioning and synthesis of information from books.  Brian urges bloggers and writers of all stripes to become better readers so they can do a better job of information their audiences.

Here’s a valuable quote from Brian’s post:

It’s been said that anyone can read five books on a topic and be an expert. That may be true, but how you read those five books will make all the difference. If you read those five books analytically, you will become an expert on what five authors have said. If you read five books syntopically, you will develop your own unique perspective and expertise in the field.

Master the True Art of Reading: How to Read A Book (Marelisa Faberge)

Marelisa uses How To Read A Book as source material but she takes a different approach by diving more deeply into the mechanics of reading.  She goes into the topic into a bit of detail but she makes it easy to understand and follow her directions.  It’s really well done.

Here’s some important insights:

When you read something–such as a magazine, a newspaper, a blog post, and so on–which is completely intelligible to you, your store of information might increase, but your understanding doesn’t. Your understanding was equal to these texts before you read them. Otherwise, you would have felt the puzzlement and perplexity that comes with reading something that is out of your depth.

When you read something that at first you don’t completely understand, then what you’re reading is initially higher than you are. The text contains insights which you lack. If you manage to acquire greater understanding after having read some text, you’ve elevated yourself through the activity of reading.

Do YOU challenge yourself enough with your reading?

Quite honestly, I’m glad I found both articles because they reinforce each other, despite being written by different authors.  I’m guessing that Marelisa read both the book and Brian’s article, which led to her own creation.  I think there’s a valuable lesson there:  take someone else’s starting point and expand upon it.  Worth remembering.

 

And then I found this one a few days later:

How To Read A Non-Fiction Book (Michael Hyatt)

Michael does not expressly describe the four levels of reading from How To Read A Book, but he alludes to both skimming and more detailed reading.  He describes ten tips for reading non-fiction books:  here a couple of Michael’s highlights:

Don’t feel that you need to finish. Not to be cynical, but most books aren’t worth finishing. I read until I lose interest. Then I move onto the next book. This is the secret to reading more.

and

Use a set of note-taking symbols. I use the same set of symbols I use when taking notes:

  • If an item is particularly important or insightful, I put a star next to it.
  • If an item requires further research or resolution, I put a question mark next to it.
  • If an item requires an action on my part or follow-up, I put a ballot box (open square) next to it. When the item is completed, I check it off.

Maybe I’m a nerd, but I found these posts to be interesting, each in their own ways.

One other interesting point I’ve come across about reading came from one of my favorite books, Advantage Play (which you really need to read).  The author describes magician Stewart James’s practice of reading magazines and newspapers (keep in mind that this reading mainly occurred prior to 1980).

James would use a sheet of paper as a bookmark as he read an article or a book.  He would make notes about important points on the bookmark, recording the location of the information (article, author, topic, page number, date, etc.).  Later on, he would use the bookmark’s information to update his own manual indexing system, which allowed him to track different pieces of information and bring them together again later when he needed them.

Can you imagine doing that manually in this day and age?  Today we’ll bookmark individual web pages and use some tags to find them again.  Or we might just be able to rely on Google to find it again without writing down a single ting.

These are all particularly refreshing thoughts about reading when it seems like we live in the era of the iPhone style scanning of content in milliseconds.

Do you have any tips about reading that have worked for you?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thoughts from Skellie of Skelliewag.org

Monday, March 29th, 2010

SkellieThis version of Thoughts From features one of my “blogging heroes”.  We know that the blogger known as Skellie (of Skelliewag.org) is female and lives in Australia and not much else except for one other important thing:   she’s a hell of a writer.  Several of her posts are featured prominently in The Blogging Nexus and, as we’ll see below, she’s involved in plenty of other projects.  Read on!

 

1. In a world and age of openness, you’ve pretty firmly managed to maintain your anonymity. Do you ever foresee a time when you’ll make your real name and face public knowledge?

People have always been really interested in my using a pseudonym – in some ways I think it has helped me stand out from the crowd in the niche I’m in, which is strongly based around people and personalities. It’s worked in my favor, and allowed me to stay quite private, so I don’t intend to have a ‘big reveal’ anytime soon. But I might use my real name or a different pseudonym for other projects in future. I’m glad to have the freedom to do that, whereas once you use your real name you can never really begin a new project with a completely blank slate.

2. How do you get your former gig as a writer for Problogger.net? (which is how I discovered you, by the way.)

That’s cool – it’s always interesting to find out how people heard about you. Sometimes from the strangest of sources!

I pitched a guest-post to Darren (Rowse, who runs ProBlogger.net), and it went well, so I wrote a few more times. He and I live in the same city so we met up for a coffee and he proposed a regular writing gig, which I was overjoyed to accept. As you can see, the gig came about by pretty ordinary means, but I put a lot of effort into my pitch to him, and a lot of effort into the final post. If you want to write for A-List blogs, you have to bring your A-game. Of course, it also helped to meet in person as far as building trust was concerned.

3. What is your current “day job”?

I work at Melbourne-based company Envato managing its Tuts+ Network of educational sites. It’s one of the largest blog networks in the world, doing about 15 million pageviews a month. I get to think about blogs 8 hours a day, which suits me fine :) It does mean that blogs are sometimes the last thing I want to think about when I get home, though!

4. Can you describe a typical day in the life of Skellie for us?

I catch a train to work. Living far out of the city, it takes a while, so I do lots of reading on the way there and back – mostly non-fiction, though I’m forcing myself to read more fiction. When I get home from work I usually spend the evening working on my latest project (at the moment it’s learning CSS-based web design), spending time with my family, kicking a soccer ball around with my dogs or my guiltiest pleasure, playing Xbox!

5. Do you read many blogs? What kinds of blogs do you read?

I try to keep the number small and limited to what I’m focusing on at the moment, or else I spend so much time reading blogs about doing cool stuff that I never do anything. I’ve recently changed my feeds list to include lots of web design related content (Nettuts+ is the best, but I’m biased!), but there are a few blogs that are perpetual favorites that have survived the cut – Derek Sivers is my favorite blogger, and I also love Coding Horror even though I don’t quite understand most of the posts! I just appreciate how much of a labor of love it is.

6. Do you have any favorite bloggers who aren’t writing as much as (or at all) the way they used to? Who do you miss reading?

Blogging is a tough medium to ‘peak’ in over a long period of time. Writers traditionally build a profile based on what they don’t publish – it’s their ability to recognize when their writing is bad and leave those bits out and publish the 1% that remains that makes them famous. Bloggers must by nature do the opposite and publish anything they can. An author can take a year off to recharge – they can write a fantasy book when their last book was a political thriller if they want fresh subject matter. Unfortunately, bloggers can’t take off months at a time, and they can’t all of a sudden completely change the focus of their blog without alienating many readers. Sometimes it feels like running a blog solo and long-term is kind of like being a writer who writes the same book over and over again, without a break. So I have sympathy to any blogger who can’t maintain their initial high-standards and frequency long-term – this has been a huge challenge for me personally.

Tim Ferriss was one of my favorite bloggers for a long-time, but I’ve lost interest in his blog over the last 6 months, and he publishes less regularly. I’m interested in his 4-HWW type stuff, but it’s clear that he’s moved on to something else – and totally his right to do so, but I don’t have to go along for the ride with him.

7. Do you read or write fiction? If so, does it have any impact on your other writing?

Like a lot of writers, I think I’m going to write a novel one day. But I write very little fiction, so I’m not doing so well at the moment.

8. Which superhero would you be and why?

Wonder Woman, undoubtedly. I’m not sure why, but that’s my answer!

9. Pretend the Internet is destroyed overnight. What do you do the next morning?

I’d be at the forefront of the group trying to rebuild it. Also, looking for a new job!

10. Any parting thoughts?

Thank you to anyone who read this far – you should probably introduce yourself to me on Twitter! :)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thoughts from Jonathan Fields Career Renegade

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

In his own words, Jonathan Fields is…a giddy dad, husband, New Yorker, multi-time health & fitness industry entrepreneur, recovering S.E.C./mega-firm hedge-fund lawyer, slightly-warped, unusually-stretchy, spiritually-inclined, obsessed with creation, small-biz and online marketing-catalyst, speaker, direct-response copywriter, entrepreneur-coach, yoga-teacher, columnist, author, once-a-decade hook-rug savant, pro-blogger and career renegade™…gone wild. Jonathan has answered questions as a part of the Thoughts From series and we’re extremely glad to have him here!

How much time do you spend using social media?

About three hours a day during the week, not much on the weekends.

Do you ever think that social media might be overrated?

I get concerned that people leverage it as the end result, rather than as a set of tools to be leveraged toward a bigger, more strategic vision. It’s also so easy for it to become not only a time-sink, but a life-sink. I’ve found that happening far more often than I’d like, so I’m now deliberately working to repattern the way I interact with social media to better accommodate my desire to have a damn life!

And, truth is, I’ve found the more I step away from screens, the more genuinely valuable content I have to share once I’ve returned, allowing for less quantity, but more quality.

Who is your favorite author and why?

Can’t say I have a single one, because I read in a variety of genres. As general rule, though, I’m drawn to writers like Malcolm Gladwell who turn weaving story and science into an art form. Also, Hemingway. The Old Man in the Sea is something I return to.

Can you name some authors who are criminally underrated, underexposed, and deserve much more recognition than they currently get?

No, and here’s why. These days, as authors, we have so much access to attention from individuals, communities and influencers at all levels. So, if you’re a truly great writer and you’re not getting the attention you feel you deserve, that’s on you.

It may take a ton of work, but if you have the writing chops, the desire and the mad work ethic, you can get your work in front of a whole lot of eyeballs.

You are in control of your own recognition engine. Drive it wherever you want, but don’t complain when you let someone else steer it an ends up in a ditch.

Is writing talent increasing or decreasing over time? What impact has the Internet had on writing skills, in your opinion?

Neither. Talent or lack thereof is just becoming more public. The internet has given everyone with a connection the ability to write publicly. If you have the jones to write, by all means write. If it’s just something you need to do, do it.

But, if you’re writing for attention, it’s not enough to have something to say, you need to have something to add. Because your asking people to pay you with their attention and competing against a sea of others for that most valuable resource.

So, when you’re writing for yourself, do what you need to do to make your heart sing, when you’re writing for others…be the signal, not the noise.

What was the biggest surprise that you encountered when writing Career Renegade?

The biggest surprises weren’t really about the content I was creating, but about the way mainstream publishing works from the inside out. It’s a an old model that’s struggling to evolve in order to adapt to a market that’s changing at breakneck speed on the creation, distribution, marketing and consumption sides. That’s actually why I wrote my Truth About Book Marketing whitepaper last year. There’s so much misinformation, I wanted to share at least a piece of what I’d discovered.

Do you use spell check or proofread yourself?

Busted! I’m terrible at spell checking and proofing. Don’t know why, it may be genetic. I have a friend who reads every post 10 or 11 times before she hits publish, that’s never been me. But, lately I am trying to put more effort into it, since I know it can reflect on your credibility.

Abraham Maslow’s theories of human motivation suggest that higher level motivations like esteem and self-actualization don’t get activated until the more basic needs are satisfied. Do you agree with his theories in that respect? In other words, how likely is it that dirt poor, insecure, and unloved individuals are bitten by the self-actualization bug?

In theory, I agree. In reality, not so sure. People shouldn’t be buying $5 lattes and $25 self-help books when they’re having trouble paying their rent. But, all to often, they do. In fact, I’ve seen a lot of people pursue some variety as transcendence as either (1) a mechanism to remove themselves from the suffering that accompanies an inability to provide basic security, or (2) a distraction from how unhappy their circumstance really is. Sometimes it works, often times not.

I think the quest for transcendence/self-actualization becomes a purer motivation, once your baseline security is taken care of.

Translation, first plug the holes, then build a bigger sail.

Pretend the Internet is destroyed overnight. What do you do when you wake up the next day?

Make coffee, write, create. The Internet is just another tool for me to build relationships, source information and, at times sell my solutions and distribute knowledge. People were doing all these things before Al Gore invented it on a dare and, if it never came to be, they’d be leveraging other tools. I operated for a long time as a brick and mortar entrepreneur before coming online, so I am comfortable creating non-web-based ways to do what I need to do.

Any final pieces of wisdom to impart to our readers?

Kick the tires of life. Just because someone else says you can’t do something doesn’t mean it’s true.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Just Write Blog Carnival entries

Friday, March 5th, 2010

A couple of my posts are featured in the March 5, 2010 edition of the Just Write Blog Carnival at Incurable Disease of Writing:

You should check out the other great posts at Just Write Blog Carnival: March 5, 2010 Edition.  There’s some interesting stuff there for fiction and non-fiction writers.

For more information about the Just Write Blog Carnival, click on this link.

For more information about the main Blog Carnival website, which is a way to get some links and traffic back to your posts, click on this link.

Have a great day!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Why do you blog if not for money?

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010
WWW's "historical" logo, created by ...

Image via Wikipedia

Blogging is just one form of content creation and creative expression available to us all on the Web.  The term blog, or weblog, has been around for twelve years.  People were journaling and posting articles and other content on the Web long before that.  People have been self-publishing in other media for hundreds of years.

Plenty of people have advice on the best ways to write a post, getting traffic to your blog, making money from your blog, and so on.

Some people will give you lots of advice on the topic(s) that you should focus your blog on.

It seems like we’ve got this whole blogging thing covered.

But then there’s one other little question that’s the most interesting of all…

WHY?

Why do we blog?  Why do we write? Why do we spend hours upon hours slaving in front of computers?  Why do we wring our brains madly on a regular basis trying to think of new and interesting things to say?  Why do we get frustrated when the words won’t come?

Some people create content in order to make money directly off their blogs by selling advertising, using affiliate links to sell stuff (I do this through my book reviews but I try not to be a PITA about it), selling their own products, etc.  That’s fine.  It’s pretty obvious that some people are trying to make their living directly through selling stuff on their blog and that’s cool.

Then there are tons of us who aren’t focusing on direct monetization, including a huge group of people who aren’t in it for the money at all.

That is what I’m interested in learning about.

Why do we blog?  More specifically, why do YOU blog?

Yes, it’s reader participation time and I’m writing this specifically for YOU. I’m being nosy today and I want to know why you do it.  What are your goals, dreams, aspirations, hopes, and wishes from this powerful medium:

  • Are you burning with the desire to get things off your chest?
  • Are you trying to change the world?
  • Are you bored and in need of something to occupy your mind?
  • Are you communicating for someone who can’t speak for themselves?
  • Are you using your blog as a platform or stepping stone for bigger and better things?
  • Are you using the blog as a way to connect with like-minded people?
  • Are you channeling an alien intelligence?
  • Etc.

Many of the items in this list apply to me (although I can’t prove that I’m channeling an alien intelligence… yet…)

I’m really curious about this.  I think introspection is a powerful tool and we can learn a lot by examining why we want to do things.  I think we all learn from seeing these ideas in print.

Please share your thoughts in the comment section so we can all learn from this.  If you write your own post about this, link back to this post and I’ll create a link back to you in this post.

Note:  I guess Ian M Rountree and I are tapped into the same hive mind because he’s written a post about blogging as well.

Bill Wren wrote on this topic some time ago in a post called Does blogging need a reason?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The struggles of writing and publishing using the Free Model

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

I was saddened to read J.C. Hutchins’s recent post where he gave his community an update on his work.  Regretfully, for his fans (and the other folks who have been enjoying his stuff), he’s decided to give up his “free” (read:  unpaid) podcasting work for the foreseeable future and is now focusing on paying writing.  He also says that his publisher has chosen not to publish the sequels to his first novel 7th Son:  Descent.  The three 7th Son novels have been available in podcast form for several years (and they’re great stuff).

(Note:  J.C. has also written Personal Effects:  Dark Arts with Jordan Weisman.)

I don’t know J. C. other than a few chats and jokes shared on Twitter, although he did contribute to a great group project on doing great work that I published here on Broadcasting Brain a number of weeks ago.  However, he strikes me as a nice guy, in addition to being talented and one heck of a hard worker.  I don’t fault him one iota for working on things that will advance his writing career and provide  him with income.  The guy’s more than paid his dues and he’s managed to put together an amazing quantity of free content out there on the Web.  Kudos to him for assessing the situation and making the decision that is right for him.

It is sad, however, that his faith in the process that he’s used has been shaken, as per the following excerpt from his blog post:

For as long as I can remember, I’ve wanted to make a living wage telling stories. That day has not yet come, and I fear that it won’t, unless some serious decisions are made. I’ve made these decisions, and I apologize for how this will affect you.

Creating podcast fiction does does not generate direct revenue for me. Based on anecdotal and statistical data, very few people are willing to pay for general podcast content, much less podcast fiction. Since my goal is to make a living wage with my words, the current monetization models — including in-show advertisements — will not deliver this. Dedicating time and effort to my non-fiction podcast projects will deliver equally underwhelming monetary results.

It is also apparent to me that using the Free model to promote a tangible product, such as I did with 7th Son: Descent and Personal Effects: Dark Art, does not deliver sustainable sales results. I have friends — some of whom are my best friends, the most talented people I’ve had the privilege to know and work with –  who have absolute faith in this model. I treasure their trailblazing efforts and enthusiasm. My faith, however, has been fundamentally rattled.

Put simply: The new media model viably supports only the most blessed and talented of authors. The time, effort and money I invest in entertaining you for free pulls my attention and talent away from projects that can generate revenue. While podcasting, podcast fiction, and — most importantly — your support and evangelism has positively impacted my life and career in ways I’ll never be able to fully express, I cannot continue to release free audiofiction if I wish to make a living wage with my words.

The sad thing is that J. C. recorded an entertaining and damned interesting thriller of an interview with Mitch Joel a couple of months ago where he seemed to be feeling more upbeat about, although a bit stressed by, the potential of the  Free Model.

None of us know the whole story, include all of the blood, sweat, and tears that Hutchins poured into these projects and none of us really know why 7th Son:  Descent didn’t meet the publisher’s expectations.  On the surface, you could point to one probable challenge that the publisher faced:  the entire trilogy has been available for free in several formats for a number of years, so how do you entice the average consumer to pay money for a copy? At the same time, however, there’s probably a large number of people who wouldn’t have know that and might not have been able to find it or figure out how to obtain access to the free versions.

I truly believe that Hutchins will eventually attain his goals, although it looks likely that he’ll have to come up with brand new, original material to do that.  I think he’s come too far and gained too much exposure for it to all end now and he still seems to have an excellent relationship with his publisher.  Nonetheless, if nothing else, this experience provides an interesting case study for the Free Model.

Here’s hoping that J.C. keeps getting the fast pitches and that he keeps swinging for the fences – I think this baseball metaphor still holds true.

EDIT (March 1, 2010)Indiana Jim’s podcast #37 has a lot of great analysis and thinking about podcasters/podcast novelists working to become professional writers, citing both J.C. Hutchins and Scott Sigler (assist to J.C. for helping to score this goal).

Broadcasting Brain is proudly powered by WordPress. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS). Copyright (c) 2010 by Mark Dykeman. All rights reserved. Theme by Omakase Design.