Archive for the 'social media' Category

Context, Reputation, and Sponsorship FTW!

communication, social media

Does something’s value really increase because of a recommendation from a trusted source or association with someone else or with some organization?

I’ve been thinking about the idea of how someone’s recommendation, sponsorship, or support can make you seem better than you might actually be. Conversely, name recognition is a form of social proof. I’ve been reading Seth Godin’s Small Is The New Big which includes one of his blog posts, Placebo Affect, The. The post contains the following phrases which triggered some more thinking:

“Why do some ideas have more currency than others? Because we believe they should.”

We’re going to talk about the power of context, reputation, and sponsorship in this blog post because if you don’t believe that they have a meaningful effect on bolstering your social media profile, or your profile in any field of interest, you need to think again.

Read the rest of this entry »

If you're new here, welcome! Please consider subscribing to my RSS feed to stay up to date with my latest posts and articles. Thanks for visiting!

Hyperion - a different vision of the Web

social media

Is it at all possible that all of these social media/Web 2.0 toys that some of us love to talk about and use may herald something bigger to come? Could a science fiction novel from 1989 be painting a picture of things that really could come?

Rex Hammock, who someone on Twitter once compared to the Web’s version of Walter Cronkite (which I would consider to be high praise), made the following quick comment on Twitter on June 28:

“FriendFeed, Twitter, Seesmic et al, are pointing in the direction of something. They aren’t the destination.”

This lead to an interesting discussion on FriendFeed about just what that something is. A number of people speculated on the future in terms of the current toolsets that we have.

Let me take a drink of the magic KoolAid and speculate a bit further, as inspired by one of my favorite science fiction novels, Hyperion. Read the rest of this entry »

Douglas Adams on the Internet

social media


DON’T PANIC!

As we continue to wonder about the best uses of social media and such, it’s interesting to check out what author Douglas Adams, the author of the stupendously successful Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy phenomenon, had to say about the Internet back in 1999:

Here’s an excerpt:

I suppose earlier generations had to sit through all this huffing and puffing with the invention of television, the phone, cinema, radio, the car, the bicycle, printing, the wheel and so on, but you would think we would learn the way these things work, which is this:

1) everything that’s already in the world when you’re born is just normal;

2) anything that gets invented between then and before you turn thirty is incredibly exciting and creative and with any luck you can make a career out of it;

3) anything that gets invented after you’re thirty is against the natural order of things and the beginning of the end of civilisation as we know it until it’s been around for about ten years when it gradually turns out to be alright really.

Someone linked to this on either FriendFeed or Twitter a few days ago - I forget who exactly. At any rate, it’s good enough to share. Plus, I hadn’t realized that Douglas Adams had this website, which is cool.

The full text of Adams’s Internet article is here.

Share and enjoy.

With great social media power should come great responsibility

social media

I’m going to stick my nose into the Feldman/Israel situation. Sort of. Actually, I’m going to suggest a better use of everyone’s time. It would be for a charitable cause and it would promote social media to boot. Everyone wins.

If anyone is wondering who Loren Feldman or Shel Israel are and what the big deal is about them, Mathew Ingram has written a good summary of their situation. Suffice it to say that the two have exchanged words in public forums and both claims that the other has done hurtful things that have caused different kinds of harm. And puppets were involved. Read the rest of this entry »

Smells like social media

communication, social media

In today’s post I’m going to play out a situation that happened almost 20 years ago and I’d like you to tell me if you think it was an early example of social media.

In 1988 and 1989, DC Comics (the publisher of popular comic books about Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, the Flash, the Teen Titans, Green Lantern, and many other characters) ran a multi-part story in their Batman comic book called A Death In The Family. This story occurred several years after the original Robin, Dick Grayson, had adopted a new superhero identity while a boy named Jason Todd took over the Robin identity. This story, a mystery in which Jason attempted to find his birth mother, featured a number of classic Batman characters, including his nemesis the Joker.

DC Comics did something quite extraordinary for the times with this story. DC Comics editorial was aware that a number of comic book readers did not like the Jason Todd character, so they decided to put some decision making power in the hands of the readers. The penultimate chapter of the story was left as a cliffhanger, where Jason was placed in a situation where he could die. DC then set up two phone numbers that fans could call: one to spare Jason’s life, a second to lead to the character’s death.

As the story goes, after the votes were tallied, a slim majority of callers voted to kill off Jason Todd.

Jason Todd was killed in the final issue of the Batman story.

This was a clear example of getting reader input and reacting to it. The technology wasn’t Web enabled or housed on the Internet, but it had some similar characteristics.

My question to you: was the use of these phone numbers to kill off a character an example of social media in action? I’d really like to know what YOU think, including your arguments FOR or AGAINST the idea.

Building up someone by tearing down another works - not

social media

Sometimes we take all of this social media, Internet marketing, and self-promotion stuff too seriously. Many of us look for role models to help shape what we do and how we do it. There are times when we take it too far and slip into adoration and idol worship. Read the rest of this entry »

Our new oral history - defined

social media

Sometimes a writer really nails something and nails it down perfectly.

If you’re interested in social media, I suggest that you check out Steven Hodson’s post where he compares social media to the ancient art of maintaining oral history.

It’s one of those points that just seems like it should be obvious, but it sometimes eludes our comprehension.

Well done Steven!

A rising tide that lifts all blogs

social media

Growth of the entire social media market is every content creator’s best hope for success. That means that bloggers in general need to continue to provide content on an ever-widening and growing field of topics and interests.

At the same time, social media enthusiasts need to continue to promote social media to any or all who are interested in order to grow the overall social media market. We’ll all benefit if that happens. Otherwise, the blogosphere will be engaging in the fierce market share wars that highlight the life of commodity producers in mature markets. And it’s pretty darned hard to compete on price when something is free.

So how do we keep growing the thing, looking at blogs in particular?

Leading Question

ReadWriteWeb’s Josh Catone asked the following question: do regular people really read blogs?

The answer to Josh’s question would seem to be no, or at least not many people do. It’s worth noting that his main source of information was a Harris Poll asking US adults about political blogs, but, as Josh also points out, there doesn’t appear to be a lot of data from 2007 or 2008 about blog reading statistics.

Let’s not forget one thing, though: the poll was limited to politics and political blogs. If long term voter trends in North America are any indication, interest in voting is waning, which could likely reflect declining interest in politics or political discussions (not withstanding The Huffington Post’s success at the top of the Technorati index). On the other hand, my general feeling is that readership of tech blogs continues to increase over time, and there are some other hot blogging areas that growing (perhaps mommy bloggers, making money online (there will always be a market for this), and business blogs in general).

(The comments section from Josh’s post, full of interesting insights, also spawned a thread at LinkedIn on the topic of blog reading that’s worth checking out.)

How to grow the blogging audience

I believe that we can increase the number of potential readers by focusing on five different areas:

Education - many people have heard what a blog is, but might not be able to tell a static website from a blog. They need to understand things like:

  • reverse-chronological sequence of publishing, which is the reverse of the structure of a lot of other documents
  • tags/categories
  • searching
  • pages
  • comments
  • RSS and news aggregators

These things are second nature to the vast majority of the current blogging audience, but some people don’t get it yet. Maybe a lot of people don’t get it yet. Marketing Ninja also has a relevant anecdote showing a situation where people preferred static documents (e.g. Adobe .PDF files) over blog posts at a ratio of 8:1 or more. There must still be a significant population of people who don’t, won’t, or can’t read online, although I don’t have any statistics to back this up. Even in my own case, there are many times when I’ll print out a blog post in order to read it later.

This brings up another good point: trust and reliability. Many people will put more faith in a professional-looking document than an amateur-looking blog, even if the blog happens to have better content. Old programming dies hard, sometimes.

Promotion of all kinds - create demand: virtually everyone in the world needs a telephone or access to one in order to conduct their business. By contrast, virtually everyone in the civilized world wants an iPod or other portable media player, but few actually need the device. However, the precedent started with the Walkman and Discman players evolved with the introduction of the digital media formats (particularly .MP3 and .MP4 files), creating desire that was satisfied with a revolutionary product both in design and capabilities. The growing number of media files, both professional and amateur, helped create demand for a new portable media player.

Blogs are like the “player” and good content will create demand for the “player”. However, we need to keep emphasizing things like portals, indexes, and search engines. Alltop, as I’ve written before, can only help to promote the blogosphere and social media in general.

Cross-promotion between bloggers, even those in the same niche, needs to continue to maximize eyeball exposure.

Value - put simply, bloggers need to provide content that other people would want to read or find useful. We don’t need spam, we don’t need a lot of echoes, we need new, fresh, and useful material. This material needs to appeal to beginners, intermediates, and experts.

Unfortunately, the blogosphere could also be called the spamosphere due to a lot of content which is designed as platforms for online advertising sales instead of valuable content. Give people material that they both want and need!

Diversity - related to value, we need to broaden the subject matter, or at least provide more valuable content across a wider range of topics. We may be digging deep into the fabled Long Tail into increasingly smaller and specialized niches, but we need more good (hopefully original) content suitable to an increasingly wider audience. Fortunately, ongoing innovation and new product launches offer a continual supply of blogging source material. We also need more material about everyday items that affect broad groups people, both within and outside the tech realms.

Opportunity - more high speed Internet and wireless access; cheaper hardware and software; ease of use. As Steven Hodson recently pointed out, what may be seen as inexpensive to some may be a prohibitive cost to others. There’s talk of $100 or $200 laptops for developing countries… maybe there’s a lot of opportunity for these in the Americas and Europe as well. In addition, inexpensive high speed Internet access is not ubiquitous, even within the Americas. My parents have only had access to medium speed Internet during the past two years and they live about 10 KM from my home. Mobile phone Web use is predicted to drive demand and may be a cheap alternative; however, this could remove any incentive to produce cheaper desktop PCs and laptop PCs.

The rising tide

The phrase “a rising tide that lifts all boats” was not coined by US President Bill Clinton, although he and his executive team made significant use of the phrase during his presidency. Here’s a definition from Wikipedia:

…is associated with the idea that improvements in the general economy will benefit all participants in that economy, and that economic policy, particularly government economic policy, should therefore focus on the general macroeconomic environment first and foremost.

Substitute the word “blogosphere” for “economy”, remove the references to government and policy, and the concept holds true for blogging. Broaden the potential blogging readership base and you help prevent commoditization. We can enlarge blog readership by following the five suggestions that I’ve presented.

Everyone can win.

A really cool Web-dependent contest

social media

It’s too cool!

Seriously, this Watchmen commercial contest, where you make a commercial, set in the Watchmen continuity, to be embedded in the upcoming Watchmen movie is too cool!

Social media might be seen as lightweight by some, but this… is just too cool!

A chance to win cash, other prizes, getting your commercial featured in the movie, maybe even getting a bit part in the film…

At what other time in history could you pull together a competition like this with these tools?

Social media makes distance irrelevant

social media 8 Comments »

Lots of conversation going on this week about social media channels and purposes and what’s next.

Julian Baldwin has a great post summarizing and linking to the various conversation threads about the forms and future of social media.

For my part, the greatest value of social media, and its potential for the future, is how it makes distance and physical barriers irrelevant.

Social media is as close to telepathy as you can get without having an actual telepath. Social media allows a direct mind-to-mind (or minds) transfer of information while removing the obvious barrier of distance. It can also strip away class, politics, religion, and upbringing as potential stumbling blocks. Language is still tricky, but there are ways to compensate for that.

Distance, however, is the greatest hurdle that social media can jump. It’s practically free when compared to travel and telecommunications costs (although both have become less expensive over time) and it allows many possible means to communicate.

Alexander van Elsas described television as possibly the greatest social media channel due to the interaction it can stimulate, primarily through large events like sporting events, but also through other special event coverage. Although he’s quite right about the impact of television and it’s ability to generate common experiences that stimulate social interaction, the fact is that today television is a one-way medium. To my way of thinking, this separates it from the media that we currently consider to be social media, although TV broadcasts certainly do stimulate emotions and socialization.

Note: a number of people have suggested that social media is a misnomer because it doesn’t exclusively lead to socialization between parties. Maybe it’s better to call them interaction media, although I doubt anyone will wish to change at this point.

Still, television broadcasts do achieve something that social media also do: communication of ideas and emotions across long distances.

You just can’t interact with the creator while the television performance is happening.