<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Old School Blogging Tips To Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/</link>
	<description>Social media and creativity for the individual, plus frequent dissection of the physical and digital worlds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:27:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/comment-page-1/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1534#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>No question that the advice was written with a different, more limited tool set in mind.  At the same time, I still think a lot of it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question that the advice was written with a different, more limited tool set in mind.  At the same time, I still think a lot of it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/comment-page-1/#comment-5600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1534#comment-5600</guid>
		<description>OK, I stand corrected - thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I stand corrected &#8211; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csalada</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/comment-page-1/#comment-5599</link>
		<dc:creator>csalada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1534#comment-5599</guid>
		<description>Barger coined &quot;weblog&quot;.  Peter Merholz shortened it to &quot;blog&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barger coined &#8220;weblog&#8221;.  Peter Merholz shortened it to &#8220;blog&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian M Rountree</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/comment-page-1/#comment-5598</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian M Rountree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1534#comment-5598</guid>
		<description>Way back when (three years ago) I had a LiveJournal. That WAS my network. Sad, right? Some of the things that Barger is describing really seem like the difference between Tumblr (or Twitter, lately) and an &quot;actual&quot; blog - that is, news-article style personally written content stream. Totally different inventions, in part.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s a trend toward convergence these days that simply didn&#039;t exist twelve years ago. I&#039;m writing this comment by way of Disq.us, with the option to Tweet it at the same time. I can see responses in my email, or on Disq.us&#039; profile page, or any number of other places. This is important, it&#039;s one of the reasons some of this advice seems janky. Any advice on &quot;best practices&quot; usually has an expiry date that seems to move at exactly the same pace as the underlying technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when (three years ago) I had a LiveJournal. That WAS my network. Sad, right? Some of the things that Barger is describing really seem like the difference between Tumblr (or Twitter, lately) and an &#8220;actual&#8221; blog &#8211; that is, news-article style personally written content stream. Totally different inventions, in part.</p>
<p>There&#39;s a trend toward convergence these days that simply didn&#39;t exist twelve years ago. I&#39;m writing this comment by way of Disq.us, with the option to Tweet it at the same time. I can see responses in my email, or on Disq.us&#39; profile page, or any number of other places. This is important, it&#39;s one of the reasons some of this advice seems janky. Any advice on &#8220;best practices&#8221; usually has an expiry date that seems to move at exactly the same pace as the underlying technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/comment-page-1/#comment-5597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1534#comment-5597</guid>
		<description>The two dangers that I see with your take on #3 are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  If you fail to take the next step, you may be writing from ignorance.  A little education never hurts.&lt;br&gt;2.  If you write your own take on the topic first, you might just conclude that you&#039;ve got it right and so you won&#039;t be motivated look elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll check out the link to TheDeets.   :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two dangers that I see with your take on #3 are:</p>
<p>1.  If you fail to take the next step, you may be writing from ignorance.  A little education never hurts.<br />2.  If you write your own take on the topic first, you might just conclude that you&#39;ve got it right and so you won&#39;t be motivated look elsewhere.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll check out the link to TheDeets.   <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayCruz</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/11/12/ten-classic-blogging-tips-analyzed/comment-page-1/#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>JayCruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1534#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>Great advice overall, but I have an exception with number 3. It&#039;s sound advice, but one should be careful on checking what others have said about what you want to say. Or even before you have anything to say. That&#039;s like reading a movie review before seeing the movie. For good or bad, it will influence you on how you perceive the film. The danger in that is that it will either stop you from writing anything or influence you and get in your subconscious. You&#039;ll end up rehashing ideas without even noticing it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don&#039;t have to post the thing, with that part I agree. But I would rephrase #3 as &quot;First draft, then re-draft, and then check what others have said about the topic&quot;. You won&#039;t write the most groundbreaking and original blog post, but it will at least come from a more &quot;pure&quot; perspective. Also, it&#039;s the best way to learn how much you really know or don&#039;t know about something. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW and adding to the link chain, Merlin picked up the John Cleese video from this post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedeets.com/2009/10/29/hey-merlin-mann-is-bashing-charlatans-useful/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thedeets.com/2009/10/29/hey-merlin-m...&lt;/a&gt; which has a great video reaction to his recent video of &quot;Knowing Who You Are&quot;. I posted the link in the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice overall, but I have an exception with number 3. It&#39;s sound advice, but one should be careful on checking what others have said about what you want to say. Or even before you have anything to say. That&#39;s like reading a movie review before seeing the movie. For good or bad, it will influence you on how you perceive the film. The danger in that is that it will either stop you from writing anything or influence you and get in your subconscious. You&#39;ll end up rehashing ideas without even noticing it.</p>
<p>You don&#39;t have to post the thing, with that part I agree. But I would rephrase #3 as &#8220;First draft, then re-draft, and then check what others have said about the topic&#8221;. You won&#39;t write the most groundbreaking and original blog post, but it will at least come from a more &#8220;pure&#8221; perspective. Also, it&#39;s the best way to learn how much you really know or don&#39;t know about something. </p>
<p>BTW and adding to the link chain, Merlin picked up the John Cleese video from this post <a href="http://www.thedeets.com/2009/10/29/hey-merlin-mann-is-bashing-charlatans-useful/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.thedeets.com/2009/10/29/hey-merlin-m.." rel="nofollow">http://www.thedeets.com/2009/10/29/hey-merlin-m..</a>. which has a great video reaction to his recent video of &#8220;Knowing Who You Are&#8221;. I posted the link in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.260 seconds -->
