<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/</link>
	<description>Social media and creativity for the individual, plus frequent dissection of the physical and digital worlds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:55:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monitoring Your Child’s Blog &#124; Kevin Sjoegren</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5557</link>
		<dc:creator>Monitoring Your Child’s Blog &#124; Kevin Sjoegren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5557</guid>
		<description>[...] The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinion (broadcasting-brain.com)  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Monitoring Your Child’s Blog&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.kevinsjoegren.com/blogging/monitoring-your-child%e2%80%99s-blog&quot; }); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinion (broadcasting-brain.com)  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Monitoring Your Child’s Blog&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.kevinsjoegren.com/blogging/monitoring-your-child%e2%80%99s-blog&quot; }); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The power of social media to prevent change &#124; Broadcasting Brain</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5554</link>
		<dc:creator>The power of social media to prevent change &#124; Broadcasting Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5554</guid>
		<description>[...] a responsibility to force debate, spread truthful information, etc.? I&#8217;m still mindful of the blogosphere post that I wrote a couple of days ago.  I can&#8217;t pretend to represent the general public of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a responsibility to force debate, spread truthful information, etc.? I&#8217;m still mindful of the blogosphere post that I wrote a couple of days ago.  I can&#8217;t pretend to represent the general public of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syrimne1</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5541</link>
		<dc:creator>syrimne1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5541</guid>
		<description>yeah, absolutely! I totally sympathized with the frustration, both yours and his...I feel the same way a lot myself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, absolutely! I totally sympathized with the frustration, both yours and his&#8230;I feel the same way a lot myself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5540</guid>
		<description>I see what you&#039;re saying now.  I see your point but I can understand some frustration over the &quot;wishy washy&quot; statement as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you&#39;re saying now.  I see your point but I can understand some frustration over the &#8220;wishy washy&#8221; statement as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syrimne1</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator>syrimne1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5539</guid>
		<description>Oh, agreed - but the &quot;Blogging with Integrity&quot; folks weren&#039;t the ones I meant! And they weren&#039;t silent...instead they came out with a wishy washy statement, which isn&#039;t the same thing at all. I didn&#039;t mean to disparage his post, I just think sometimes people inadvertantly fuel phenomena simply by reacting to them...it takes more self-discipline to be silent about it, and try to populate the blogosphere with more intelligent discourse. Those who could contribute a lot sometimes seem to think they need to solve the problem by fighting it directly, and I guess I disagree that that is always the best approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, agreed &#8211; but the &#8220;Blogging with Integrity&#8221; folks weren&#39;t the ones I meant! And they weren&#39;t silent&#8230;instead they came out with a wishy washy statement, which isn&#39;t the same thing at all. I didn&#39;t mean to disparage his post, I just think sometimes people inadvertantly fuel phenomena simply by reacting to them&#8230;it takes more self-discipline to be silent about it, and try to populate the blogosphere with more intelligent discourse. Those who could contribute a lot sometimes seem to think they need to solve the problem by fighting it directly, and I guess I disagree that that is always the best approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5538</guid>
		<description>Perhaps there&#039;s a lot of drama there, but I think he had a valid point about the Blogging With Integrity badges and reaction of the other bloggers.  It doesn&#039;t mean that the female blogger in question would need to be ostracized by her peers or community, but silence would seem to indicate a lack of will to live by the standards implied in the underlying code of conduct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps there&#39;s a lot of drama there, but I think he had a valid point about the Blogging With Integrity badges and reaction of the other bloggers.  It doesn&#39;t mean that the female blogger in question would need to be ostracized by her peers or community, but silence would seem to indicate a lack of will to live by the standards implied in the underlying code of conduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syrimne1</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/24/blogosphere-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-5536</link>
		<dc:creator>syrimne1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=1420#comment-5536</guid>
		<description>I find his article interesting (I went and read the source after reading yours). He makes some good points, but doesn&#039;t point out an obvious contradiction - the fact that he&#039;s paying so much attention to what I would consider &quot;blogosphere-induced&quot; fluff is part of the problem. A lot of the drama and obvious attention-grabbing stories just scream for anyone with integrity to ignore. The first step to making the community better is to not give the tabloid-type attention grabbing yet *more* attention or energy...not by screaming at it, which just feeds the drama and superficial &quot;controversy.&quot; I read a lot of the stuff he&#039;s irate about, and I think &quot;who cares?&quot; in the same way I think &quot;who cares?&quot; in the supermarket line where the tabloids scream at me to care about Brangelina or Jennifer Aniston&#039;s dinner with...whoever. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds goodie-goodie maybe, but a lot of problems are best tackled by refusing to grant them a hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find his article interesting (I went and read the source after reading yours). He makes some good points, but doesn&#39;t point out an obvious contradiction &#8211; the fact that he&#39;s paying so much attention to what I would consider &#8220;blogosphere-induced&#8221; fluff is part of the problem. A lot of the drama and obvious attention-grabbing stories just scream for anyone with integrity to ignore. The first step to making the community better is to not give the tabloid-type attention grabbing yet *more* attention or energy&#8230;not by screaming at it, which just feeds the drama and superficial &#8220;controversy.&#8221; I read a lot of the stuff he&#39;s irate about, and I think &#8220;who cares?&#8221; in the same way I think &#8220;who cares?&#8221; in the supermarket line where the tabloids scream at me to care about Brangelina or Jennifer Aniston&#39;s dinner with&#8230;whoever. </p>
<p>Sounds goodie-goodie maybe, but a lot of problems are best tackled by refusing to grant them a hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.355 seconds -->
