<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinions have equal airtime but unequal credibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/</link>
	<description>Social media and creativity for the individual, plus frequent dissection of the physical and digital worlds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:41:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4301</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill.  That&#039;s a very thoughtful way to approach comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill.  That&#39;s a very thoughtful way to approach comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4300</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4300</guid>
		<description>Hello Mark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Greetings from the world of triiibes. I really like Carpenter&#039;s observation about strong narratives, especially the notion of a shared narrative that develops over time. It makes for an interesting goal for developing a blog. Darren Rowse is definitely a good example of a blogger with a strong narrative, and it&#039;s a narrative that seems to extend beyond his authoritative voice on professional blogging.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for comments, I&#039;m generally guilty of spending too much time on them. I tend to think through what I&#039;m going to say and edit frequently in notepad before pasting into the comment box. Don&#039;t know if it makes my comments any better, but I do try to avoid being a comment spammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mark,</p>
<p>Greetings from the world of triiibes. I really like Carpenter&#39;s observation about strong narratives, especially the notion of a shared narrative that develops over time. It makes for an interesting goal for developing a blog. Darren Rowse is definitely a good example of a blogger with a strong narrative, and it&#39;s a narrative that seems to extend beyond his authoritative voice on professional blogging.</p>
<p>As for comments, I&#39;m generally guilty of spending too much time on them. I tend to think through what I&#39;m going to say and edit frequently in notepad before pasting into the comment box. Don&#39;t know if it makes my comments any better, but I do try to avoid being a comment spammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree with what you are saying.  Your opinion is reasoned AND you&#039;ve been doing this quite awhile as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree with what you are saying.  Your opinion is reasoned AND you&#39;ve been doing this quite awhile as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t (and am not) worried about you, Mark  I just like early 1980s pop culture references, liked the song lyric myself and wanted to send some link love ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My comment on your piece in general here is if you want to breakout of the echo chamber and rise above it to have a bigger audience, it&#039;s a challenge.  I mean you&#039;re focused on a niche not that many people care about in general (relatively speaking) and though Louis&#039; is a remarkable story, even with all his growth on a page view basis his blog is teeny tiny.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s very hard to differentiate yourself when there are dozens (or hundreds) doing the same thing.  This doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be done, but increases the level of difficult substantially.  It&#039;s not always clear to me that most of the people gazing their navels on this topic really are interested,  motivated  or willing to do the work involved with  rising above to stand out from the crowd.  In fact, in most cases it seems clear they are not.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s hard to stand out even if you are motivated and interested, but it&#039;s a lot harder when you&#039;re not.  Many seem to wish to externalize this and make it a function of something other than themselves.  I believe that&#039;s folly, but that&#039;s just my opinion.  It&#039;s not knee-jerk reaction, but it is just an opinion nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t (and am not) worried about you, Mark  I just like early 1980s pop culture references, liked the song lyric myself and wanted to send some link love <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My comment on your piece in general here is if you want to breakout of the echo chamber and rise above it to have a bigger audience, it&#39;s a challenge.  I mean you&#39;re focused on a niche not that many people care about in general (relatively speaking) and though Louis&#39; is a remarkable story, even with all his growth on a page view basis his blog is teeny tiny.</p>
<p>It&#39;s very hard to differentiate yourself when there are dozens (or hundreds) doing the same thing.  This doesn&#39;t mean it can&#39;t be done, but increases the level of difficult substantially.  It&#39;s not always clear to me that most of the people gazing their navels on this topic really are interested,  motivated  or willing to do the work involved with  rising above to stand out from the crowd.  In fact, in most cases it seems clear they are not.  </p>
<p>It&#39;s hard to stand out even if you are motivated and interested, but it&#39;s a lot harder when you&#39;re not.  Many seem to wish to externalize this and make it a function of something other than themselves.  I believe that&#39;s folly, but that&#39;s just my opinion.  It&#39;s not knee-jerk reaction, but it is just an opinion nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>What can I say, I&#039;m talented.  Oh, and don&#039;t eat the fish at the next restaurant that you visit - it&#039;ll be bad.   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say, I&#39;m talented.  Oh, and don&#39;t eat the fish at the next restaurant that you visit &#8211; it&#39;ll be bad.   <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawksdomain</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4296</link>
		<dc:creator>hawksdomain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4296</guid>
		<description>OK, this is just too weird.  It is as if you have some sort of crystal ball to see what is going on in my world!  ;)  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had pretty much stopped commenting on any blogs with my opinions because although I had read the post, it seemed I was not getting the author&#039;s intentions most of the time.  I am a fairly well educated person and I tend to pick up on things rather quickly, but I think my problem was reading too much too quickly.  After enough embarrassment, I have slowed myself down and have forced myself to re-read any posts that I want to comment on, to make sure that my opinion is even related to what the author has written. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are those who are just out there to spam the comments to add their links to a site or just to get their name to be recognized, but it&#039;s nice to see that you are also recognizing that there are those of us who are just moving way too fast for our own good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this is just too weird.  It is as if you have some sort of crystal ball to see what is going on in my world!  <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I had pretty much stopped commenting on any blogs with my opinions because although I had read the post, it seemed I was not getting the author&#39;s intentions most of the time.  I am a fairly well educated person and I tend to pick up on things rather quickly, but I think my problem was reading too much too quickly.  After enough embarrassment, I have slowed myself down and have forced myself to re-read any posts that I want to comment on, to make sure that my opinion is even related to what the author has written. </p>
<p>There are those who are just out there to spam the comments to add their links to a site or just to get their name to be recognized, but it&#39;s nice to see that you are also recognizing that there are those of us who are just moving way too fast for our own good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanelsas</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>vanelsas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>Agree ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>To your point, if the writer makes it clear that his or her comment is just that, a knee-jerk reaction or opinion, then I don&#039;t have a problem with that.  However, if you&#039;re just echoing common knowledge or else spitting in the face of generally accepted practices just to self-promote, I&#039;d have to question the value of doing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To your point, if the writer makes it clear that his or her comment is just that, a knee-jerk reaction or opinion, then I don&#39;t have a problem with that.  However, if you&#39;re just echoing common knowledge or else spitting in the face of generally accepted practices just to self-promote, I&#39;d have to question the value of doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanelsas</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/08/06/opinions-have-equal-airtime-but-unequal-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>vanelsas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=771#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t necessarily a bad thing to ventilate an opinion without having done research. That is what an opinion is, a personal view about a subject. Having said that I have noticed and noted before that people often enter on-line discussions without actually having read the post where it all started with. Often bold statements are provided as truths without some sort of indication that it is an opinion. As a result discussions on Friendfeed for example sometimes seem to have become a long list of bold statements where people aren&#039;t really discussing anything, or wander off from the intent of the blog post itself (it gets hijacked).&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not sure if it is a bad thing. Sometimes it helps to be bold and it leads to more interesting interactions. But as a reader you will always need to make your own judgment about the trustworthiness of any statement, including the blog post that is written ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#39;t necessarily a bad thing to ventilate an opinion without having done research. That is what an opinion is, a personal view about a subject. Having said that I have noticed and noted before that people often enter on-line discussions without actually having read the post where it all started with. Often bold statements are provided as truths without some sort of indication that it is an opinion. As a result discussions on Friendfeed for example sometimes seem to have become a long list of bold statements where people aren&#39;t really discussing anything, or wander off from the intent of the blog post itself (it gets hijacked).<br />I&#39;m not sure if it is a bad thing. Sometimes it helps to be bold and it leads to more interesting interactions. But as a reader you will always need to make your own judgment about the trustworthiness of any statement, including the blog post that is written <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.299 seconds -->
