<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An unexpected effect of blog subscribers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/</link>
	<description>Social media and creativity for the individual, plus frequent dissection of the physical and digital worlds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:53:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: markdykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>markdykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=685#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>@Kudzu - it can happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kudzu &#8211; it can happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kudzu Fire</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>Kudzu Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=685#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>I look forward to one day having subscriber problems.  I am not there yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to one day having subscriber problems.  I am not there yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markdykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>markdykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=685#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>@Michael - yes, there are some pretty high profile bloggers who&#039;ve kept their numbers secret.   :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael &#8211; yes, there are some pretty high profile bloggers who&#8217;ve kept their numbers secret.   <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=685#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>I waited until it was over 500, but to each his own. Having it at less than 100 can act in a negative fashion and convince people you&#039;re not worth it. Yes, it&#039;s shallow, but people make snap judgments like that all the time.

One interesting phenomenon is that if everything else about the blog is rockin&#039; people will often assume a much higher subscriber count than what actually exists if they don&#039;t see any numbers. In no way am I saying anybody should take down their subscriber count, but it&#039;s food for thought.

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/michaelmartine/ymYs/~3/309599785/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why the Bleeding Edge of Social Media is Important for Tech Bloggers&lt;/a&gt; from Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I waited until it was over 500, but to each his own. Having it at less than 100 can act in a negative fashion and convince people you&#8217;re not worth it. Yes, it&#8217;s shallow, but people make snap judgments like that all the time.</p>
<p>One interesting phenomenon is that if everything else about the blog is rockin&#8217; people will often assume a much higher subscriber count than what actually exists if they don&#8217;t see any numbers. In no way am I saying anybody should take down their subscriber count, but it&#8217;s food for thought.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/michaelmartine/ymYs/~3/309599785/" rel="nofollow">Why the Bleeding Edge of Social Media is Important for Tech Bloggers</a> from Michael Martine | Remarkablogger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markdykeman</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>markdykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=685#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>@Micheal - exactamundo, as the Fonz would say.  Although I used to publish my subscriber count, I stopped doing it for awhile.  I decided to wait until I was firmly above 200 subscribers before I went public again.  I figured that 200 subs. was an adequate sign of social proof so back out the number came.  And, fortunately, it continues to trend upward.   :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Micheal &#8211; exactamundo, as the Fonz would say.  Although I used to publish my subscriber count, I stopped doing it for awhile.  I decided to wait until I was firmly above 200 subscribers before I went public again.  I figured that 200 subs. was an adequate sign of social proof so back out the number came.  And, fortunately, it continues to trend upward.   <img src='http://broadcasting-brain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/06/14/an-unexpected-effect-of-blog-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=685#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>Congrats on increasing your subscriber count! Increased subscribers reach a tipping point where it is your subscribers who are submitting your posts to social media. Increased subscribers also help increase... subscribers! Social proof, it&#039;s called. People see a high subscriber count and they want in. Subscribers are more likely to link to you, which will have an effect on referral traffic.

So, overall, a higher subscriber count is one metric to pay attention to, much more so than page views.

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/michaelmartine/ymYs/~3/309599785/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why the Bleeding Edge of Social Media is Important for Tech Bloggers&lt;/a&gt; from Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on increasing your subscriber count! Increased subscribers reach a tipping point where it is your subscribers who are submitting your posts to social media. Increased subscribers also help increase&#8230; subscribers! Social proof, it&#8217;s called. People see a high subscriber count and they want in. Subscribers are more likely to link to you, which will have an effect on referral traffic.</p>
<p>So, overall, a higher subscriber count is one metric to pay attention to, much more so than page views.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/michaelmartine/ymYs/~3/309599785/" rel="nofollow">Why the Bleeding Edge of Social Media is Important for Tech Bloggers</a> from Michael Martine | Remarkablogger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.273 seconds -->
