<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two alternatives to the PR black lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/</link>
	<description>Social media and creativity for the individual, plus frequent dissection of the physical and digital worlds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:49:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brainadmin</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>brainadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=641#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>@Steph - I wish that I could take credit for the phrase &quot;interruption marketing&quot;, but I think it goes back to Seth Godin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steph &#8211; I wish that I could take credit for the phrase &#8220;interruption marketing&#8221;, but I think it goes back to Seth Godin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=641#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>I like the phrase &quot;interruption marketing.&quot; That&#039;s exactly what it is.

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://stephweiss.blogspot.com/2008/04/pink-hibiscus-bits-originally-uploaded.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Photos &amp; phlowers&lt;/a&gt; from Steph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the phrase &#8220;interruption marketing.&#8221; That&#8217;s exactly what it is.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://stephweiss.blogspot.com/2008/04/pink-hibiscus-bits-originally-uploaded.html" rel="nofollow">Photos &amp; phlowers</a> from Steph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainadmin</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>brainadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=641#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>@Steph - quite eloquent.  As I said above, these two ideas are probably only bandaids, but they could be another step in a discussion.  This problem is much larger than either the PR or blogger camps and is really about spam, cold-calling, and interruption marketing (?) in general, in my opinion.

Your comments about the potential abuse of the E-mail medium is kind of like the issue where any public space is not only considered to be a target for littering, but advertising as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steph &#8211; quite eloquent.  As I said above, these two ideas are probably only bandaids, but they could be another step in a discussion.  This problem is much larger than either the PR or blogger camps and is really about spam, cold-calling, and interruption marketing (?) in general, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Your comments about the potential abuse of the E-mail medium is kind of like the issue where any public space is not only considered to be a target for littering, but advertising as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=641#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the problem is that we have a generation of PR practitioners who believe that because a medium exists to reach people, they are entitled to use it. It does not occur to them that they are wasting someone&#039;s time because &quot;Hey, it&#039;s just one stupid e-mail, so wtf, just delete it if you don&#039;t want it.&quot; The deluge is not their responsibility....

To me, it&#039;s the same as individual smokers who toss their butts out the window of the car. &quot;Oh come on, it&#039;s not litter, it&#039;s just one little cigarette butt.&quot; There is a sense of entitlement that their convenience is more important than anything external. 

In either case, making the offenders&#039; names public has no effect because in the offenders&#039; minds, we just don&#039;t &#039;get it.&#039; There are enough people who share their sense of entitlement that they can always find a handful who say, &quot;Yeah, like hitting the delete key is so hard, right?&quot; or &quot;Yeah, like anybody can even see one little cigarette butt on the side of the highway.&quot; And although your ideas are optimistically brilliant, they will have the same effect as designating a stretch of highway as a &quot;Scenic Corridor.&quot; Those who care about &#039;scenic&#039; are already not throwing their trash out the window; renaming the road will not change the others&#039; habits.

Telemarketers stopped calling *only* because the law has some teeth, a physical threat to their pocketbook, followed by actual enforcement. The process will only stop when these PR practitioners&#039; *customers* start to lose business and fire the PR folks -- and even then, the PR folks will just find some other like-minded customer who feels entitled to spray his/her message without thinking.

Oh heavens, I&#039;m usually such an optimist... but &quot;responsibility&quot; is the dark side of &quot;freedom.&quot; Too many people believe they are entitled to use any public space in any way they want: spamming the Internet, tossing trash out the window, playing the boombox at full volume in the middle of a public park, etc. Voluntary systems work on pride/peer-pressure. At some point -- as in now -- there are too many &quot;entitled&quot; peers to make any voluntary system work, because there is no sense of &#039;shame&#039; at doing these things.

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://stephweiss.blogspot.com/2008/04/pink-hibiscus-bits-originally-uploaded.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Photos &amp; phlowers&lt;/a&gt; from Steph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the problem is that we have a generation of PR practitioners who believe that because a medium exists to reach people, they are entitled to use it. It does not occur to them that they are wasting someone&#8217;s time because &#8220;Hey, it&#8217;s just one stupid e-mail, so wtf, just delete it if you don&#8217;t want it.&#8221; The deluge is not their responsibility&#8230;.</p>
<p>To me, it&#8217;s the same as individual smokers who toss their butts out the window of the car. &#8220;Oh come on, it&#8217;s not litter, it&#8217;s just one little cigarette butt.&#8221; There is a sense of entitlement that their convenience is more important than anything external. </p>
<p>In either case, making the offenders&#8217; names public has no effect because in the offenders&#8217; minds, we just don&#8217;t &#8216;get it.&#8217; There are enough people who share their sense of entitlement that they can always find a handful who say, &#8220;Yeah, like hitting the delete key is so hard, right?&#8221; or &#8220;Yeah, like anybody can even see one little cigarette butt on the side of the highway.&#8221; And although your ideas are optimistically brilliant, they will have the same effect as designating a stretch of highway as a &#8220;Scenic Corridor.&#8221; Those who care about &#8217;scenic&#8217; are already not throwing their trash out the window; renaming the road will not change the others&#8217; habits.</p>
<p>Telemarketers stopped calling *only* because the law has some teeth, a physical threat to their pocketbook, followed by actual enforcement. The process will only stop when these PR practitioners&#8217; *customers* start to lose business and fire the PR folks &#8212; and even then, the PR folks will just find some other like-minded customer who feels entitled to spray his/her message without thinking.</p>
<p>Oh heavens, I&#8217;m usually such an optimist&#8230; but &#8220;responsibility&#8221; is the dark side of &#8220;freedom.&#8221; Too many people believe they are entitled to use any public space in any way they want: spamming the Internet, tossing trash out the window, playing the boombox at full volume in the middle of a public park, etc. Voluntary systems work on pride/peer-pressure. At some point &#8212; as in now &#8212; there are too many &#8220;entitled&#8221; peers to make any voluntary system work, because there is no sense of &#8217;shame&#8217; at doing these things.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://stephweiss.blogspot.com/2008/04/pink-hibiscus-bits-originally-uploaded.html" rel="nofollow">Photos &amp; phlowers</a> from Steph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainadmin</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>brainadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=641#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>@Jason - thanks.  I keep coming back to the idea that bad pitches are very similar to getting cold-called by a telemarketer, which is what made me think of the &quot;no pitch&quot; list.  The Blogger&#039;s Code of Ethics sounds like a good idea, too.

Hopefully this takes the conversation a bit further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason &#8211; thanks.  I keep coming back to the idea that bad pitches are very similar to getting cold-called by a telemarketer, which is what made me think of the &#8220;no pitch&#8221; list.  The Blogger&#8217;s Code of Ethics sounds like a good idea, too.</p>
<p>Hopefully this takes the conversation a bit further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Falls</title>
		<link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/05/12/pr-blacklist-alternatives/comment-page-1/#comment-2065</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Falls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadcasting-brain.com/?p=641#comment-2065</guid>
		<description>Great ideas, Mark. I agree they are just band aids, but certainly are better approaches than the public embarrassment of PR firms and practitioners. And frankly, your ideas don&#039;t necessarily have to be unenforceable. If IABC and PRSA could get their heads out of their antiquated asses and realize social media is having a profound effect on their businesses, they could administer something simple, like Ogilvy&#039;s Blogger Code of Ethics as a membership guideline. If every member were forced to take it to heart and reassess how they pitch media members, particularly bloggers, there would be a quick turnabout and wholesale in-box noise reduction. No, it wouldn&#039;t totally eliminate the problem, but it would make a huge dent. Nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great ideas, Mark. I agree they are just band aids, but certainly are better approaches than the public embarrassment of PR firms and practitioners. And frankly, your ideas don&#8217;t necessarily have to be unenforceable. If IABC and PRSA could get their heads out of their antiquated asses and realize social media is having a profound effect on their businesses, they could administer something simple, like Ogilvy&#8217;s Blogger Code of Ethics as a membership guideline. If every member were forced to take it to heart and reassess how they pitch media members, particularly bloggers, there would be a quick turnabout and wholesale in-box noise reduction. No, it wouldn&#8217;t totally eliminate the problem, but it would make a huge dent. Nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.262 seconds -->
