Twitter - not a great debating tool
microblogging March 17th. 2008, 8:59amWhile using Twitter this weekend I witnessed a couple of debates between various Twitter users that I follow. Leaving people and personalities aside, I don’t think that Twitter is a very good platform for debates.
- The 140 character limit really causes problems. You’ve either got to make your point in 26 words or less or else continue a conversation over multiple Tweets which tend to get lost if you have a number of people in your timeline.
- In some cases, I believe that people’s responses were compressed to making a “sound bite” that would fit into the 140 chr. limit.
- The ability to adequately explain a point of view was just not there, particular if anyone watching the debate didn’t understand or appreciate the full context of the conversation.
- Regardless of intent, a number of comments were perceived to be ad hominem arguments, at least in part due to brevity (again, my opinion) and word choice
The thing is, Twitter provides a forum that a lot of people can participate in and thus, if nothing else, it has a share of attention that could be used to have debates of this type.
Maybe it would be worth creating a Twitter debate guidelines document of some kind.
Does one already exist? I’m going to check this out.
If you're new here, welcome! Please consider subscribing to my RSS feed to stay up to date with my latest posts and articles. Thanks for visiting!

March 17th, 2008 at 9:22 am
I tend to agree on the limitations of twitter as a debate tool still if the answers are not limited in size and the discussions are much longer it could lead to too long a debates to be able to read and follow
March 17th, 2008 at 10:41 am
i think if you have perfected the art of debating in abbreviations, it’s fine.
P1: IHA (i hate apple)
P2: IDA.AMFC (i don’t agree. apple makes a fine computer)
P1: YJJCYNRRCS (you’re just jealous cos you’re not running a real computer system)
P2: ARCS!!! (apple is a real computer system!!)
P1: NIN!! (no it’s not)
ah, the last one proves a problem, since that could be interpreted as nine inch nails.
until people can debate in abbreviations, best not do it on twitter.
March 17th, 2008 at 11:18 am
@Heather - I agree
@Jansie - that’s it - an acroynm guide is the answer!
March 17th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
@ Heather - I also agree…
@ Jansie - That is hilarious! We all had a good larf about your mock debate at work here this eve…an acronym guide would be key!
This is a thought provoking post…I have only recently had a debate with someone via IM and even that was frustrating…a lot of cleverness needed to make a perfect point in less than 140 characters…
March 17th, 2008 at 11:55 pm
You know, I still haven’t really gotten the feel of microblogging. The only reason I have been using Twitter is because I have saved the icon on my iPhone and whenever I am waiting for the subway or just waiting in general, I’ll log on. Its rare that I go out of my way to log on. Maybe I just haven’t gotten addicted enough yet.
March 18th, 2008 at 6:54 am
@sammy_sunshine - Holding a real debate via Twitter would be an excellent challenge, but I believe that a lot of comments exchanged in these “debates” were being presented as self-evident truths, which I didn’t feel comfortable with.
@Kali - Twitter didn’t grow on me until my followers list began to get larger AND when I started making contact with various followers. As the number of conversations increase, the value becomes more evident.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:57 am
ah, sorry, acronym was the word i was looking for, not abbreviation. sorry, for ruining a fine conversation. IRAS.ISIFBMC (i really am sorry. i shall in future be more careful). hmmm, maybe i should tweet that. in fact, i shall.
March 20th, 2008 at 9:38 am
[...] I definitely think that Twitter has some advantages as a conversation platform, although as I’ve said earlier this week, I don’t think Twitter is a good platform to hold a debate. [...]